Income Inequality, Equal Opportunity, and Attitudes about Redistribution
L. Steele. Social Science Quarterly, 96 (2):
444-464(2015)(ISSP).
Аннотация
Objectives
This paper explores how income inequality and social mobility affect attitudes about redistribution in global perspective.
Methods
Individual-level data on over 50,000 individuals from 38 countries in the International Social Survey Programme is combined with country-level data from the World Bank, the Standardized Income Inequality Database, and the Economic Freedom of the World data. OLS regression models with robust, clustered standard errors are estimated to account for the presence of unobserved, country-level effects in the error terms.
Results
Social mobility is found to be a more important predictor of preferences for redistribution than income inequality. Specifically, those who live in countries with greater social mobility are more supportive of redistribution while individuals who have experienced upward mobility themselves are less supportive, although an upwardly mobile individual in a more mobile society is more supportive of redistribution than an upwardly mobile individual in a less mobile society.
Conclusions
The central finding of this study is that the tangibility of redistributive social policies may bolster support for social spending. The structures and institutions that facilitate upward mobility - and potentially attenuate some of the detrimental effects of income inequality - are generally the products of more comprehensive redistribution policies, and public opinion may reflect this.
%0 Journal Article
%1 steele2015income
%A Steele, Liza G.
%D 2015
%J Social Science Quarterly
%K 2015 FDZ_IUP ISSP ISSP_input2016 SCOPUSindexed SSCIindexed article checked indexproved input2016 isspbib2016 review_proved reviewed
%N 2
%P 444-464
%T Income Inequality, Equal Opportunity, and Attitudes about Redistribution
%V 96
%X Objectives
This paper explores how income inequality and social mobility affect attitudes about redistribution in global perspective.
Methods
Individual-level data on over 50,000 individuals from 38 countries in the International Social Survey Programme is combined with country-level data from the World Bank, the Standardized Income Inequality Database, and the Economic Freedom of the World data. OLS regression models with robust, clustered standard errors are estimated to account for the presence of unobserved, country-level effects in the error terms.
Results
Social mobility is found to be a more important predictor of preferences for redistribution than income inequality. Specifically, those who live in countries with greater social mobility are more supportive of redistribution while individuals who have experienced upward mobility themselves are less supportive, although an upwardly mobile individual in a more mobile society is more supportive of redistribution than an upwardly mobile individual in a less mobile society.
Conclusions
The central finding of this study is that the tangibility of redistributive social policies may bolster support for social spending. The structures and institutions that facilitate upward mobility - and potentially attenuate some of the detrimental effects of income inequality - are generally the products of more comprehensive redistribution policies, and public opinion may reflect this.
@article{steele2015income,
abstract = {Objectives
This paper explores how income inequality and social mobility affect attitudes about redistribution in global perspective.
Methods
Individual-level data on over 50,000 individuals from 38 countries in the International Social Survey Programme is combined with country-level data from the World Bank, the Standardized Income Inequality Database, and the Economic Freedom of the World data. OLS regression models with robust, clustered standard errors are estimated to account for the presence of unobserved, country-level effects in the error terms.
Results
Social mobility is found to be a more important predictor of preferences for redistribution than income inequality. Specifically, those who live in countries with greater social mobility are more supportive of redistribution while individuals who have experienced upward mobility themselves are less supportive, although an upwardly mobile individual in a more mobile society is more supportive of redistribution than an upwardly mobile individual in a less mobile society.
Conclusions
The central finding of this study is that the tangibility of redistributive social policies may bolster support for social spending. The structures and institutions that facilitate upward mobility - and potentially attenuate some of the detrimental effects of income inequality - are generally the products of more comprehensive redistribution policies, and public opinion may reflect this.},
added-at = {2019-03-20T18:49:19.000+0100},
author = {Steele, Liza G.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2faad194869ca03331db89670d2778571/gesis_dump},
interhash = {e91b869a4e8b6bbfec4dee463a0a5ec0},
intrahash = {faad194869ca03331db89670d2778571},
journal = {Social Science Quarterly},
keywords = {2015 FDZ_IUP ISSP ISSP_input2016 SCOPUSindexed SSCIindexed article checked indexproved input2016 isspbib2016 review_proved reviewed},
note = {(ISSP)},
number = 2,
pages = {444-464},
tagadata-svko-dda-test = {10844},
tagadata-svkoddatest2 = {10837},
timestamp = {2019-10-01T13:01:27.000+0200},
title = {Income Inequality, Equal Opportunity, and Attitudes about Redistribution},
volume = 96,
year = 2015
}