We argue that reform in curriculum and instruction should be based on allowing students to problematize the subject. Rather than mastering skills and applying them, students should be engaged in resolving problems. In mathematics, this principle fits under the umbrella of problem solving, but our interpretation is different from many problem-solving approaches. We first note that the history of problem solving in the curriculum has been infused with a distinction between acquiring knowledge and applying it. We then propose our alternative principle by building on John Dewey's idea of "reflective inquiry," argue that such an approach would fac…(more)
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 citeulike:507552
%A Hiebert, James
%A Carpenter, Thomas P.
%A Fennema, Elizabeth
%A Fuson, Karen
%A Human, Piet
%A Murray, Hanlie
%A Olivier, Alwyn
%A Wearne, Diana
%D 1996
%J Educational Researcher
%K learning mathematics mathgamespatterns solving problem pbl
%N 4
%P 12--21
%T Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics
%U http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-189X%28199605%2925%3A4%3C12%3APSAABF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6
%V 25
%X We argue that reform in curriculum and instruction should be based on allowing students to problematize the subject. Rather than mastering skills and applying them, students should be engaged in resolving problems. In mathematics, this principle fits under the umbrella of problem solving, but our interpretation is different from many problem-solving approaches. We first note that the history of problem solving in the curriculum has been infused with a distinction between acquiring knowledge and applying it. We then propose our alternative principle by building on John Dewey's idea of "reflective inquiry," argue that such an approach would facilitate students' understanding, and compare our proposal with other views on the role of problem solving in the curriculum. We close by considering several common dichotomies that take on a different meaning from this perspective.
@article{citeulike:507552,
abstract = {We argue that reform in curriculum and instruction should be based on allowing students to problematize the subject. Rather than mastering skills and applying them, students should be engaged in resolving problems. In mathematics, this principle fits under the umbrella of problem solving, but our interpretation is different from many problem-solving approaches. We first note that the history of problem solving in the curriculum has been infused with a distinction between acquiring knowledge and applying it. We then propose our alternative principle by building on John Dewey's idea of {"}reflective inquiry,{"} argue that such an approach would facilitate students' understanding, and compare our proposal with other views on the role of problem solving in the curriculum. We close by considering several common dichotomies that take on a different meaning from this perspective.},
added-at = {2006-06-05T02:47:21.000+0200},
author = {Hiebert, James and Carpenter, Thomas P. and Fennema, Elizabeth and Fuson, Karen and Human, Piet and Murray, Hanlie and Olivier, Alwyn and Wearne, Diana},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a7cfab8b095892fcca8ae84b623e0bed/yish},
citeulike-article-id = {507552},
interhash = {78aacf6672580e54af323b7568bd6077},
intrahash = {a7cfab8b095892fcca8ae84b623e0bed},
journal = {Educational Researcher},
keywords = {learning mathematics mathgamespatterns solving problem pbl},
number = 4,
pages = {12--21},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2006-06-05T02:47:21.000+0200},
title = {Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics},
url = {http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-189X%28199605%2925%3A4%3C12%3APSAABF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6},
volume = 25,
year = 1996
}