From post

“GIVE ME A GUN AND I WILL MAKE ALL BUILDINGS MOVE”: AN ANT’S VIEW OF ARCHITECTURE

, и . Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research, (2008)"It is well known that we live in a very different world than that of Euclidian space: phenomenologists (and psychologists of the Gibsonian school) have never tired of showing that there is an immense distance in the way an embodied mind experiences its surroundings from the “objective” shape that “material” objects are said to possess. They have tried to add to the “Galilean” bodies rolling through Euclidian space, “human” bodies ambling through a “lived” environment. I All this is very well, except it does nothing more than to reproduce, at the level of architecture, the usual split between subjective and objective dimensions that has always paralyzed architectural theory—not to mention the well known split it has introduced between the architectural and engineering professions (and not to mention the catastrophic consequences it has had on philosophy proper). What is so strange in this argument is that it takes for granted that engineering drawings on a piece of paper and, later, projective geometry offer a good description of the so-called “material” world. This is the hidden presupposition in the whole of phenomenology: we have to add human subjective intentional dimensions to a “material” world that is well described by geometric shapes and mathematical calculations. The paradoxical aspect of this division of labor envisioned by those who want to add the “lived” dimensions of human perspective to the “objective” necessities of material existence is that, in order to avoid reducing humans to things, they first had to reduce things to drawings." p 82.

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed.

 

Другие публикации лиц с тем же именем

The DESPEC setup for GSI and FAIR, , , , , , , , , и 158 other автор(ы). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, (июня 2022)Response of the FAst TIMing Array (FATIMA) for DESPEC at FAIR Phase-0, , , , , , , , , и 28 other автор(ы). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, (ноября 2023)Broken seniority symmetry in the semimagic proton mid-shell nucleus 95Rh, , , , , , , , , и 79 other автор(ы). Phys. Rev. Res., 6 (2): L022038 (мая 2024)Commissioning the FAst TIMing array (FATIMA) at FAIR Phase-0: Half-lives of excited states in the N=50 isotones 96Pd and 94Ru, , , , , , , , , и 37 other автор(ы). Radiation Physics and Chemistry, (2022)15th International Symposium on Radiation Physics.Nature of seniority symmetry breaking in the semimagic nucleus 94Ru, , , , , , , , , и 77 other автор(ы). Phys. Rev. C, 105 (3): L031304 (марта 2022)Microscopic structure of the one-phonon 2+ states of 208Po, , , , , , , , , и 22 other автор(ы). Phys. Rev. C, 104 (2): 024311 (августа 2021)Experimental evidence for low-lying quadrupole isovector excitation of 208Po, , , , , , , , , и 14 other автор(ы). The European Physical Journal A, 56 (246): 7 (октября 2020)The DESPEC setup for GSI and FAIR, , , , , , , , , и 158 other автор(ы). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, (2022)“GIVE ME A GUN AND I WILL MAKE ALL BUILDINGS MOVE”: AN ANT’S VIEW OF ARCHITECTURE, и . Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research, (2008)"It is well known that we live in a very different world than that of Euclidian space: phenomenologists (and psychologists of the Gibsonian school) have never tired of showing that there is an immense distance in the way an embodied mind experiences its surroundings from the “objective” shape that “material” objects are said to possess. They have tried to add to the “Galilean” bodies rolling through Euclidian space, “human” bodies ambling through a “lived” environment. I All this is very well, except it does nothing more than to reproduce, at the level of architecture, the usual split between subjective and objective dimensions that has always paralyzed architectural theory—not to mention the well known split it has introduced between the architectural and engineering professions (and not to mention the catastrophic consequences it has had on philosophy proper). What is so strange in this argument is that it takes for granted that engineering drawings on a piece of paper and, later, projective geometry offer a good description of the so-called “material” world. This is the hidden presupposition in the whole of phenomenology: we have to add human subjective intentional dimensions to a “material” world that is well described by geometric shapes and mathematical calculations. The paradoxical aspect of this division of labor envisioned by those who want to add the “lived” dimensions of human perspective to the “objective” necessities of material existence is that, in order to avoid reducing humans to things, they first had to reduce things to drawings." p 82.Collectivity at the prolate-oblate transition: The 2_1+ lifetime of 190W, , , , , , , , , и 79 other автор(ы). Phys. Lett. B., (октября 2024)