( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguation

From post

копироватьудалитьдобавить публикацию в буфер
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

. Multivariate behavioral research, 46 (3): 399-424 (мая 2011)Propensity score; Introductori.
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed.

Austin Echema

Severin Austin

Austin Assoku

Evan Austin

Austin Bren

 

Другие публикации лиц с тем же именем

A Data-Generation Process for Data with Specified Risk Differences or Numbers Needed to Treat.. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 39 (3): 563-577 (2010)Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints., , и . BMC medical research methodology, 14 (1): 137+ (22.12.2014)A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review., и . The international journal of biostatistics, 7 (1): 6 (января 2011)6729<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>TY: GENERIC; J2: ijb; M1: 1;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Mesures de resultats; Observacionals; Propensity score.The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 29 (6): 661-77 (2009)5458<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Propensity score.An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.. Multivariate behavioral research, 46 (3): 399-424 (мая 2011)Propensity score; Introductori.Accounting for Competing Risks in Clinical Research, , и . (2024)Bayesian modeling of missing data in clinical research, и . Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49 (3): 821--836 (01.06.2005)Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding., , , , , , , и . BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 330 (7497): 960-2 (апреля 2005)Critical appraisal; Observacionals; Propensity score.Inflation of Type I error rate in multiple regression when independent variables are measured with error, и . The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 37 (1): 33--46 (марта 2009)Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research.. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 38 (6): 1228-1234 (2009)