bnd is the Swiss army knife of OSGi, it is used for creating and working with OSGi bundles. Its primary goal is take the pain out of developing bundles. With OSGi you are forced to provide additional metadata in the JAR's manifest to verify the consistency of your "class path". This metadata must be closely aligned with the class files in the bundle and the policies that a company has about versioning. Maintaining this metdata is an error prone chore because many aspects are redundant.
SOA - BPEL and ESB dependency analyzer - A simple tool for analyzing the dependencies between BPEL processes and ESB services. This tool shows relations between the BPEL process and ESB service through partner links, and WSDL operations.
New version 0.7, includes a simple graphically visualizers dependencies between services and you can download here.
Allows the analyzing dependencies:
* between Oracle SOA 10g - BPEL projects
* between Oracle SOA 10g - ESB services
* between (WSDL) operations in BPEL processes
* between Oracle SOA 10g - BPEL processes and ESB service
On its third major release, Webpack introduced a new feature: scope hoisting. Many developers are already exposing data showing great positive impacts on the initial execution time of their bundles…
R. Hwa, P. Resnik, A. Weinberg, and O. Kolak. ACL '02: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 392--399. Morristown, NJ, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2001)
N. Messai, M. Devignes, A. Napoli, and M. Sma\"ıl-Tabbone. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2008), volume 5113 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 189-202. Springer, (2008)
V. Spitkovsky, H. Alshawi, and D. Jurafsky. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, page 751--759. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2010)
W. Headden, III, M. Johnson, and D. McClosky. Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, page 101--109. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2009)
R. Kern, M. Muhr, and M. Granitzer. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, page 351--354. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2010)
Q. Zhang, Y. Wu, T. Li, M. Ogihara, J. Johnson, and X. Huang. Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, page 726--727. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2009)
J. Nivre. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, page 351-359. Association for Computational Linguistics Morristown, NJ, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics Morristown, NJ, USA, (2009)Uppsala University.
R. McDonald, and G. Satta. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies, page 121--132. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2007)