Visualization of graph data is incredibly challenging, particularly when it comes to extremely large, scale-free graphs and social networks. A few simple searches on the Web and you will find some mesmerizing and very cool images. Perhaps the most cited...
The site presents a hierarchical organization for Wikipedia articles with respect to their semantic similarity and provides search and navigation facilities over the hierarchy. The hierarchy is constructed as a recursive division of the English Wikipedia graph into dense subgraphs (graph communities) and can be considered as an extension to the Wikipedia category structure. Unlike Wikipedia categories that are primarily authored by humans, the community hierarchy is fully automatic, purely link-based and reflects the global link structure of Wikipedia.
Thermography provides a monitoring technique for modern production processes. Our thermal imaging systems are self-contained and portable to cater all areas of thermography and being able to meet a wide range of requirements.
THE SCIENTIFIC BUSINESS OF THOMSON REUTERS TO OFFER PLAGIARISM DETECTION SERVICE VIA MANUSCRIPT CENTRAL IN CONJUNCTION WITH CROSSCHECK
Manuscript Central v4.2 to Offer its Customers Access to Services Verifying the Originality of All Scholarly Content Submitted on the System
Philadelphia , PA USA - May 1, 2008 - The Scientific business of Thomson Reuters today announced that Manuscript Central’s online workflow system will incorporate the iThenticate checking tool into its submission and peer review process, and will develop suitable policies and guidelines. CrossRef recently announced an agreement with iParadigms, LLC to launch the CrossCheck service to aid in verifying the originality of scholarly content. Following on the success of CrossRef’s recent pilot of CrossCheck, the service is scheduled to go live in June and will be offered via Manuscript Central.
Manuscript Central’s integration with the iThenticate tool will allow CrossCheck member journals and publishers to send submissions for comparison to the iThenticate service at any point in the peer review or acceptance workflow. With status indicators and a quick view of comparison results, journals will be enabled to investigate suspected documents much further back in the peer review process, potentially saving valuable time and resources in the peer review workflow.
I. Golan, and R. El-Yaniv. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, page 9781–9791. Red Hook, NY, USA, Curran Associates Inc., (2018)