Was Microsoft für die Zukunft der Software hält und begeistert auf der Entwicklerkonferenz Build 2017 vorstellt, findet heise-online-Redakteur Fabian Scherschel einfach nur gruselig.
An Open Source, Micro Development Kit for IoT Applications | via https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/9xveq5/rogue_raspberrypi_found_in_network_closet_need/
Welcome to the website of the project SemProM, products keep a diary: smart labels give products a memory and support intelligent logistics. Within the IKT-2020 research program of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research the Innovation Alliance “Digital Product Memory” (DPM) is developing key technologies for the Internet of Things in the cooperative project SemProM. By the use of integrated sensors, relations in the production process become transparent and supply chains as well as environmental influences retraceable. The producer gets supported and the consumer better informed about the product.
The Smart-Its project is interested in a far-reaching vision of computation embedded in the world. In this vision, mundane everyday artefacts become augmented as soft media, able to enter into dynamic digital relationships. In our project, we approach this vision with development of "Smart-Its" - small-scale embedded devices that can be attached to everyday objects to augment them with sensing, perception, computation, and communication. We think of these "Smart-Its" as enabling technology for building and testing ubiquitous computing scenarios, and we will use them to study emerging functionality and collective context-awareness of information artefacts.
Kevin Ashton [cofounder and executive director of the Auto-ID Center], RFID Journal Jun 22, 2009— "I could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure the phrase "Internet of Things" started life as the title of a presentation I made at Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1999. Linking the new idea of RFID in P&G's supply chain to the then-red-hot topic of the Internet was more than just a good way to get executive attention. It summed up an important insight—one that 10 years later, after the Internet of Things has become the title of everything from an article in Scientific American to the name of a European Union conference, is still often misunderstood. "
by Marcelo Rinesi, The Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies: Volkswagen didn’t make a faulty car: they programmed it to cheat intelligently. The difference isn’t semantics, it’s game-theoretical (and it borders on applied demonology).
The mission of the Object Memory Modeling Incubator Group is to define an object memory format, which allows for modeling of events or other information about individual physical artifacts - ideally over their lifetime - and which is explicitly designed to support data storage of those logs on so-called smart labels attached to the physical artifact.
S. Nayak, and R. Patgiri. (2020)cite arxiv:2004.04024Comment: This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible.
Gokilavani, Ashin, Unnikrishnan, Sunder, and Ajay. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume VI (Issue IV):
102-107(May 2019)1. Arampatzis, T., et al. (2005) A Survey of Security Issues in Wireless Sensors Networks, in Intelligent Control. Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation, 719-724. 2. Anna Gerber,” Simplify your IoT solution with IoT Architecture, IBM Document, 2017 3. Computing and its role in the internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13–16, 2012 4. Charith Perera, Chi Harold Liu, Srimal Jayawardena―The Emerging Internet of Things marketplace From an Industrial Perspective: A Survey”,IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing‖, 31 Jan 2015. 5. Chen, X.-Y. and Jin, Z.-G. (2012) Research on Key Technology and Applications for the Internet of Things. Physics Procedia, 33,561-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.104 6. F. Bonomi, R. Milito, P. Natarajan, and J. Zhu, “Fog computing: a platform for internet of things and analytics,” in Big Data and Internet of Things: A RoadMap for Smart Environments, pp. 169–186, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. 7. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami,“Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements,and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 7,pp. 1645–1660, 2013. 8. Jayavardhana, G., Rajkumar, B., Marusic, S. and Palaniswami, M. (2013) Internet of Things: A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Generation. 9. Sebastian, S., Ray, P.P., 2015. Development of IoT invasive architecture for complying with health of home. In: Proceedings of I3CS, Shillong, pp. 79–83. 10. Somayya Madakam, R. Ramaswamy, Siddharth Tripathi Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review Journal of Computer and Communications, 2015, 3, 164-173. Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. 11. Tuhin Borgohain, Uday Kumar, Sugata Sanyal,”Survey of Security and Privacy Issues of Internet of Things” Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Pages: 2372-2378 (2015) ISSN: 0975-0290. 12. The Internet of Things Reference Model, Whitepaper from Cisco 13. The Intel IoT platform, Architecture Specification White paper 14. Zeeshan Javeed,” Edge Analytics, the pros and cons of immediate local insight, 2017 blog ..