( en | de | ru )

 

  2. Tag
  3. verbal Skills

Lesezeichen  

    Keine Treffer.
  • ⟨⟨
  • ⟨
  • ⟩
  • ⟩⟩

Publikationen  1  

  •  

    , und . Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 10 (1): 137-140 (Fal 2003 2003)MT: Electronic; Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; MD: Literature-Review; CRN: Number of References: 13; Displayed: 13.; REF: Conyers, C. M., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, D. C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498. Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423-438. Green, C. W., Gardner, S. M., & Reid, D. H. (1997). Increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities: A program replication and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 217-228. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., Canipe, V. S., & Gardner, S. M. (1991). A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 537-552. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., White, L. K., Haiford, R. C., Brittain, D. P., & Gardner, S. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31-43. Hughes, C., Hwang, B., Kim, J. H., Eisenman, L. T., & Killian, D. J. (1995). Quality of life in applied research: A review and analysis of empirical measures. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 623-641. Lohrmann-O'Rouke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1032.0.CO;2 Martin, G., & Yu, C. T. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test Special Issue. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 10-36. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255. Schwartzman, L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2003). Choice responding as a function of choice-presentation method and level of preference in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, 1, 1-7..
    vor 18 Jahren von @quinn
     
      caregivers;descriptions;responding;stimulusbehaviortangibles;Pictorialpictures;choicedisabilityStimuli;Skillsmodalities;developmentalverbalcommunication
      (0)
      KopierenLöschenDiese Publikation zur Ablage hinzufügen
       
       
    • ⟨⟨
    • ⟨
    • 1
    • ⟩
    • ⟩⟩