jepcastel > DecisionMaking

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

No matching posts.

⟨⟨
⟨
⟩
⟩⟩

publications (hide)26
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force
M. Berger, M. Mamdani, D. Atkins, and M. Johnson. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12 (8): 1044-52 (November 2009)5730<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 100883818; 0 (Prescription Drugs); CIN: Value Health. 2009 Nov;12(8):1042-3. PMID: 19818061; 2009/09/29 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>CER.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:methods
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standards
DataCollection
DataCollection:methods
DataInterpretation
Databases
DecisionMaking
DecisionSupportTechniques
Economics
Factual
Humans
Internationality
OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare)
OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):methods
Pharmaceutical
PrescriptionDrugs
PrescriptionDrugs:standards
Research
RetrospectiveStudies
Statistical
UnitedStates
RCT
ComparativeEffectivenessResearchComparativeEffectivenessResearch:methodsComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standardsDataCollectionDataCollection:methodsDataInterpretationDatabasesDecisionMakingDecisionSupportTechniquesEconomicsFactualHumansInternationalityOutcomeAssessment(HealthCare)OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare):methodsPharmaceuticalPrescriptionDrugsPrescriptionDrugs:standardsResearchRetrospectiveStudiesStatisticalUnitedStatesRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1From practice to research: the case for criticism in an age of evidence.
M. Berkwits. Social science & medicine (1982), 47 (10): 1539-45 (November 1998)6542<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20041117; JID: 8303205; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>EBM; Critical appraisal.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DecisionMaking
Evidence-BasedMedicine
Humans
Research
DecisionMakingEvidence-BasedMedicineHumansResearch
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Bayesian methodology for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in critical care medicine: a primer for clinicians.
A. Kalil, and J. Sun. Critical care medicine, 42 (10): 2267-77 (October 2014)Mètodes bayessians; RCT; Introductori; UCI.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
BayesTheorem
ClinicalTrials
ClinicalTrialsasTopic
ClinicalTrialsasTopic:methods
ClinicalTrialsasTopic:standards
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:methods
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standards
CriticalCare
CriticalCare:methods
CriticalCare:standards
DecisionMaking
Humans
Meta-AnalysisasTopic
PhaseIIIasTopic
PhaseIIIasTopic:methods
PhaseIIIasTopic:standards
PracticeGuidelinesasTopic
PracticeGuidelinesasTopic:standards
ReproducibilityofResults
StatisticsasTopic
StatisticsasTopic:methods
StatisticsasTopic:standards
TreatmentOutcome
BayesTheoremClinicalTrialsClinicalTrialsasTopicClinicalTrialsasTopic:methodsClinicalTrialsasTopic:standardsComparativeEffectivenessResearchComparativeEffectivenessResearch:methodsComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standardsCriticalCareCriticalCare:methodsCriticalCare:standardsDecisionMakingHumansMeta-AnalysisasTopicPhaseIIIasTopicPhaseIIIasTopic:methodsPhaseIIIasTopic:standardsPracticeGuidelinesasTopicPracticeGuidelinesasTopic:standardsReproducibilityofResultsStatisticsasTopicStatisticsasTopic:methodsStatisticsasTopic:standardsTreatmentOutcome
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1The performance of risk prediction models.
T. Gerds, T. Cai, and M. Schumacher. Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 50 (4): 457-79 (August 2008)Models predictius.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Algorithms
Benchmarking
Bias(Epidemiology)
Computer-Assisted
DecisionMaking
HeadandNeckNeoplasms
HeadandNeckNeoplasms:diagnosis
Humans
Models
Prognosis
ROCCurve
RiskAssessment
RiskAssessment:methods
Statistical
AlgorithmsBenchmarkingBias(Epidemiology)Computer-AssistedDecisionMakingHeadandNeckNeoplasmsHeadandNeckNeoplasms:diagnosisHumansModelsPrognosisROCCurveRiskAssessmentRiskAssessment:methodsStatistical
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Introduction to the findings of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis: what is a prognostic study?
L. Salmi, J. Cassidy, L. Holm, C. Cancelliere, P. Côté, and J. Borg. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 95 (3 Suppl): S95-100 (March 2014)Models predictius<br/><br/>Taula 1 resum d'estudis pronòstics.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
BiomedicalResearch
BiomedicalResearch:methods
BrainInjuries
BrainInjuries:diagnosis
DecisionMaking
Humans
Policy
Prognosis
ReproducibilityofResults
TraumaSeverityIndices
BiomedicalResearchBiomedicalResearch:methodsBrainInjuriesBrainInjuries:diagnosisDecisionMakingHumansPolicyPrognosisReproducibilityofResultsTraumaSeverityIndices
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
J. Jansen, T. Trikalinos, J. Cappelleri, J. Daw, S. Andes, R. Eldessouki, and G. Salanti. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 17 (2): 157-73 (March 2014)Network meta-analysis.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
bias
checklist
credibility
decisionmaking
indirectcomparisons
mixedtreatmentcomparisons
multipletreatmentcomparison
networkmeta-analysis
questionnaire
relevance
validity
biaschecklistcredibilitydecisionmakingindirectcomparisonsmixedtreatmentcomparisonsmultipletreatmentcomparisonnetworkmeta-analysisquestionnairerelevancevalidity
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard

⟨⟨
⟨
1
2
⟩
⟩⟩

BibSonomy

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)26
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force

1From practice to research: the case for criticism in an age of evidence.

1Bayesian methodology for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in critical care medicine: a primer for clinicians.

1The performance of risk prediction models.

1Introduction to the findings of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis: what is a prognostic study?

1Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.

browse

related tags

concepts

tags

bookmarks (hide) displayallbookmarks onlybookmarks per page5102050100 sort byadded attitle RSSBibTeXXML

publications (hide)26 displayallpublications onlypublications per page5102050100 sort byadded attitleauthorpublication dateentry typehelp for advanced sorting... RSSBibTeXRDFmore...

browse

related tags

tags

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)26
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...