Zusammenfassung
This paper provides a review of the rhetoric behind the component movement in educational
software, and a critical analysis and synthesis of issues underlying the movement. We draw on
case studies of several significant recent component projects in order to assess claims and to
uncover and examine issues that are less often considered. While our empirical base cannot
definitively answer all the questions raised, we hope to bring some clarity and some empirically
based judgments to bear on how a promising technological innovation can best serve
educational ends.
Our study led to a focus on three critical issues: (1) the nature of the environment in which
components are configured and used; (2) the extent of modifiability that is necessary for
effective re-use of components; (3) how the work of designing components and component
configurations is distributed among people with different competencies
Nutzer