Understanding decisions about the allocation of resources into colony growth and reproduction in social insects is one of the challenging issues in sociobiology. In their seminal paper, Macevicz and Oster predicted that, for most annual insect colonies, a bang–bang strategy should be favoured by selection, i.e. a strategy characterised by an “ergonomic phase” with exponential colony growth followed by a “reproductive phase” with all resources invested into the production of sexuals. Yet, there is empirical evidence for the simultaneous investment into the production of workers and sexuals in annual colonies (graded control). We, therefore, re-analyse and extend the original model of Macevicz and Oster. Using basic calculus, we can show that sufficiently strong negative correlation between colony size and worker efficiency or increasing mortality of workers with increasing colony size will favour the evolution of graded allocation strategies. By similar reasoning, graded control is predicted for other factors limiting colony productivity (for example, if queens’ egg laying capacity is limited).
art%3A10.1007%2Fs00040-009-0004-6.pdf:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/3E4AJ6D6/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00040-009-0004-6.pdf:application/pdf;Full Text PDF:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/NUTU8CNT/Poitrineau et al. - 2009 - Workers, sexuals, or both Optimal allocation of r.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/EARSNUHE/10.html:text/html
%0 Journal Article
%1 poitrineau_workers_2009
%A Poitrineau, K.
%A Mitesser, O.
%A Poethke, H. J.
%D 2009
%J Insectes Sociaux
%K imported olivervinzenzmitesser
%N 2
%P 119--129
%R 10.1007/s00040-009-0004-6
%T Workers, sexuals, or both? Optimal allocation of resources to reproduction and growth in annual insect colonies
%U http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00040-009-0004-6
%V 56
%X Understanding decisions about the allocation of resources into colony growth and reproduction in social insects is one of the challenging issues in sociobiology. In their seminal paper, Macevicz and Oster predicted that, for most annual insect colonies, a bang–bang strategy should be favoured by selection, i.e. a strategy characterised by an “ergonomic phase” with exponential colony growth followed by a “reproductive phase” with all resources invested into the production of sexuals. Yet, there is empirical evidence for the simultaneous investment into the production of workers and sexuals in annual colonies (graded control). We, therefore, re-analyse and extend the original model of Macevicz and Oster. Using basic calculus, we can show that sufficiently strong negative correlation between colony size and worker efficiency or increasing mortality of workers with increasing colony size will favour the evolution of graded allocation strategies. By similar reasoning, graded control is predicted for other factors limiting colony productivity (for example, if queens’ egg laying capacity is limited).
@article{poitrineau_workers_2009,
abstract = {Understanding decisions about the allocation of resources into colony growth and reproduction in social insects is one of the challenging issues in sociobiology. In their seminal paper, Macevicz and Oster predicted that, for most annual insect colonies, a bang–bang strategy should be favoured by selection, i.e. a strategy characterised by an “ergonomic phase” with exponential colony growth followed by a “reproductive phase” with all resources invested into the production of sexuals. Yet, there is empirical evidence for the simultaneous investment into the production of workers and sexuals in annual colonies (graded control). We, therefore, re-analyse and extend the original model of Macevicz and Oster. Using basic calculus, we can show that sufficiently strong negative correlation between colony size and worker efficiency or increasing mortality of workers with increasing colony size will favour the evolution of graded allocation strategies. By similar reasoning, graded control is predicted for other factors limiting colony productivity (for example, if queens’ egg laying capacity is limited).},
added-at = {2016-09-26T15:28:27.000+0200},
author = {Poitrineau, K. and Mitesser, O. and Poethke, H. J.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2df3458ce76c8605ec33c02ed2ead0e36/teegroup},
doi = {10.1007/s00040-009-0004-6},
file = {art%3A10.1007%2Fs00040-009-0004-6.pdf:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/3E4AJ6D6/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00040-009-0004-6.pdf:application/pdf;Full Text PDF:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/NUTU8CNT/Poitrineau et al. - 2009 - Workers, sexuals, or both Optimal allocation of r.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/media/thomas/USBArbeit/zotero/storage/EARSNUHE/10.html:text/html},
interhash = {df8aa81b222f96e27b24dabe41419c0e},
intrahash = {df3458ce76c8605ec33c02ed2ead0e36},
issn = {0020-1812, 1420-9098},
journal = {Insectes Sociaux},
keywords = {imported olivervinzenzmitesser},
language = {en},
month = feb,
number = 2,
pages = {119--129},
shorttitle = {Workers, sexuals, or both?},
timestamp = {2021-01-05T10:59:19.000+0100},
title = {Workers, sexuals, or both? {Optimal} allocation of resources to reproduction and growth in annual insect colonies},
url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00040-009-0004-6},
urldate = {2016-09-26},
volume = 56,
year = 2009
}