Before steps are taken to impose limits on the use of social media and mobile technologies in schools, policymakers and educators need to consider the consequences for learning that such restrictions would produce. In this document, we argue that such action should carefully consider the advantages of social media for learning and that these guidelines for responsible use bring media into mentored environments where they can be safely explored and shared.
Many of the problems raised by these new technologies – from bullying to engaging in risky behavior – are not new to the public discourse, but are merely being delivered in different media. The challenge to responsible educators remains the same: to provide stimulating and safe learning environments that support the acquisition of practical skills necessary for full participation as a 21st-century citizen. Achieving this without mentored use of new technologies seems both impractical and counterproductive. One of the most powerful reasons to permit the use of social media and mobile devices in the classroom is to provide an opportunity for students to learn about their use in a supervised environment that emphasizes the development of attitudes and skills that will help keep them safe outside of school.
G. Sakko, T. Martin, T. Vause, G. Martin, und C. Yu. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109 (1):
44-52(Januar 2004)MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Young-Adulthood (18-29-yrs); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); LO: Canada; MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; CRN: Number of References: 17; Displayed: 17.; REF: Barker-Collo, S., Jamieson, J., & Boo, F. (1995). Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test: Prediction of communication ability in persons with developmental disabilities. International journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19, 23-28. Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (1999). Hierarchical ordering of auditory discriminations and the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 6, 32-50. Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J. A. (1977). The measurement of motor, visual, and auditory discrimination skills Monograph. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 95-112. Martin, G. L., & Pear, J. J. (2003). Behavior modification: What is it and how to do it (7th ed.). Upper Saddle Rivers, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 7, 10-36. Martin, G. L., Yu, D., Quinn, G., & Patterson, S. (1983). Measurement and training of AVC discrimination skills: Independent confirmation and extension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 231-237. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.4.231 Meyerson, L. (1977). AVC behavior and attempts to modify it Monograph. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 119-122. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1995). The ABLA test for predicting performance of develop-mentally disabled persons on prevocational training tasks. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19, 12-17. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1998). Matching training tasks to abilities of people with mental retardation: A learning test versus experienced staff. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102, 473-484. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1022.0.CO;2 Tharinger, D., Schauert, D., & Kerr, N. (1977). Use of AVC tasks to predict classroom learning in mentally retarded children. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 113-118. Vause, T., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (1999). Aberrant behavior of persons with developmental disabilities as a function of the characteristics of training tasks. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 321-325. Vause, T., Martin, G. L., Cornick, A., Harapiak, S., Chong, L., Yu, D. C. T., & Garinger, J. (2000). Training task assignments and aberrant behavior of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 37-53. Wacker, D. P. (1981). Applicability of discrimination assessment procedure with hearing impaired mentally handicapped clients. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 51-58. Wacker, D. P., Kerr, N. J., & Carroll, J. L. (1983). Discrimination skill as a predictor of prevocational performance of institutionalized mentally retarded clients. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 45-49. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.1.45 Wacker, D. P., Steil, D. A., & Greenebaum, F. T. (1983). Assessment of discrimination skills of multiply-handicapped preschoolers and prediction of classroom task performance. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 65-78. Witt, J. C., & Wacker, D. P. (1981). Teaching children to respond to auditory directives: An evaluation of two procedures. Behavior Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities, 2, 175-189. Yu, D., & Martin, G. L. (1986). Comparison of two procedures to teach visual discriminations to severely mentally handicapped persons. Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicap, 10, 7-12..
P. Cimiano, A. Hotho, und S. Staab. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'04), Seite 435-439. Valencia, Spain, IOS Press, (2004)
P. Dolog, N. Henze, W. Nejdl, und M. Sintek. Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters, Seite 170--179. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
W. Schenck, und R. Möller. Kapitel Staged Learning of Saccadic Eye Movements with a Robot Camera Head, Seite 82-91. World Scientific, New Jersey, London, (2004)
Y. LeCun, F. Huang, und L. Bottou. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings
of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 2, Seite II-97--104 Vol.2. (2004)
V. Kaptelinin, K. Danielsson, und U. Hedestig. Paper presented at the First Kaleidoscope SIG CSCL Conference (Lausanne, Switzerland, October 2004), (2004)