Arztbewertungen aus ganz Deutschland helfen Ihnen, den passenden Arzt für sich zu finden. Erfahren Sie, bei wem sich andere Patienten gut aufgehoben fühlen.
This is my review of "Amazon Search Dominator" - a new program for writers by Tony Norton.
Find out more here: http://warriorplus.com/o/a/jz50sp/gnvsb
It is a very comprehensive manual for all authors with some really surprising and ingenious ideas for getting your book to the top of Amazon.
Please watch the video for my full report.
The market currently has products and numerous somanabolic muscle maximizer review applications. They are sure to encounter numerous products and applications made by different people and brands, if individuals considering muscle building analyze the market for somanabolic. But in reality, hardly any of these applications really work in any way. So, until they pick anyone to follow, users need to compare the software. They see what pros and customers tell about specific products and also can find some reviews.
Digital Profit Course Reviews are the best source if you want to get the detailed insights and suggestions for the course modules. These online reviews are pos…
Issue Twenty from Pieces for Small Orchestra by Norman Lock String Theory by Steven Schutzman Three Short Shorts by Patrik Linhart The Song of the Nightingale by Fernando Arrojo-Ramos Seven Pieces of Meat by David Ray The Noctis Equi by Deb R. Lew
CTI reviews the direct-to-video movie featuring one of the most charismatic and controversial figureheads of the modern Pentecostal movement. From the review: "Rossi, who wrote and directed the 2001 Motion Picture Council Best Documentary winner Saving Si
Naboj is a dynamical website that lets you review online scientific articles. Right now the only articles that are available for review are those that have been posted at Los Alamos arXiv.
It is often said that peer review is one of the pillars of scientific research. It is also well known that peer review doesn't actually do its job very well, and, every few years, people like me start writing articles about alternatives to peer review. This isn't one of those rants. Instead, I'm going to focus on something that is probably less well known: peer review actually has two jobs. It's used to provide minimal scrutiny for new scientific results, and to act as a gatekeeper for funding agencies.
What I would like to do here is outline some of the differences between peer review in these two jobs and the strengths and weaknesses of peer review in each case. This is not a rant against peer review, nor should it be—I have been pretty successful in both publications and grant applications over the last couple of years. But I think it's worth exploring the idea that peer review functions much better in the case of deciding the value of scientific research than it does when acting as a gatekeeper for scientific funding.
In the spring of 2010, I was privileged to have a conversation with Simon Schaffer, who pointed me to the work of a sociologist and philosopher of science named Harry Collins. This year, I discovered and read Collins' new book, Tacit and Explicit Knowledge, and a somewhat older book, The Shape of Actions (co-authored with…
The Elsevier Grand Challenge: Knowledge Enhancement in the Life Sciences is a contest created to improve the way scientific information is communicated and used. The contest invites members of the scientific community to describe and prototype a tool to improve the interpretation and identification of meaning in (online) journals and text databases relating to the life sciences. Specifically we are looking for new ways to:
How strange it seems! These Hebrews in their graves,
Close by the street of this fair seaport town,
Silent beside the never-silent waves,
At rest in all this moving up and down!
http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poem/1328.html
http://wc3.worldcrossing.com/webx?14@@.1de35bad/13
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes specially commissioned review articles designed to bring together under one cover, current advances in the ever broadening field of renewable and sustainable energy. The coverage of the journal includes the following areas:
Resources
•Bioenergy
•Geothermal
•Hydrogen
•Hydropower
•Ocean
•Solar
•Wind
Applications and Services
•Buildings
•Industry and Electricity
•Transport
Policy
•Economic aspects
•Environmental impact, emissions
•Political aspects
•Energy planning
•Social aspects
•Trends: past, present, future
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Regional Focused Coverage of Renewable Energy
Green CS, Bavelier D.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. csgreen@umn.edu
Human beings have an amazing capacity to learn new skills and adapt to new environments. However, several obstacles remain to be overcome in designing paradigms to broadly improve quality of life. Arguably, the most notable impediment to this goal is that learning tends to be quite specific to the trained regimen and does not transfer to even qualitatively similar tasks. This severely limits the potential benefits of learning to daily life. This review discusses training regimens that lead to the acquisition of new knowledge and strategies that can be used flexibly across a range of tasks and contexts. Possible characteristics of training regimens are proposed that may be responsible for augmented learning, including the manner in which task difficulty is progressed, the motivational state of the learner, and the type of feedback the training provides. When maximally implemented in rehabilitative paradigms, these characteristics may greatly increase the efficacy of training.
D. Taraborelli (2008), Soft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP 08), Carry-Le-Rouet, France, May 20-23, 2008
Preise, Stipendien, Projekte: Deutschlands Wissenschaftsförderer vergeben viele Millionen und lenken Schicksale. Die Gutachter-Arbeit leisten die netten Peers von nebenan - ist doch Ehrensache. Dafür winkt kein Geld, höchstens Ruhm und Fleißkärtchen. Wie lange geht das noch gut?
What is an external review? External review provides an independent review process for individuals covered by a fully insured Massachusetts health plan who have been denied benefits for reasons of medical necessity. In order to be eligible for external review, the service or supply being requested must be a covered benefit in the particular health plan contract -- that is, it cannot be explicitly excluded from the health plan. Medical professionals who are not affiliated with your health plan review your case and issue a determination. The results of external reviews are binding on your health plan.
P. Royle, L. Bain, and N. Waugh. BMC medical research methodology, 5 (1):
2(January 2005)LR: 20061115; PUBM: Electronic; DEP: 20050108; JID: 100968545; 2004/08/11 received; 2005/01/08 accepted; 2005/01/08 aheadofprint; epublish.
S. French, S. McDonald, J. McKenzie, and S. Green. BMC medical research methodology, (October 2005)LR: 20061115; PUBM: Electronic; DEP: 20051014; JID: 100968545; 2005/08/05 received; 2005/10/14 accepted; 2005/10/14 aheadofprint; epublish.
S. Golder, H. McIntosh, and Y. Loke. BMC medical research methodology, (May 2006)PUBM: Electronic; DEP: 20060508; JID: 100968545; 2005/10/18 received; 2006/05/08 accepted; 2006/05/08 aheadofprint; epublish.
T. Kurtz. Stochastic Systems: Modeling, Identification and Optimization, I, volume 5 of Mathematical Programming Studies, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (1976)
D. Dawson, L. Gorostiza, and A. Wakolbinger. Asymptotic methods in stochastics, volume 44 of Fields Inst. Commun., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2004)