Two queueing theorists of Ghent University investigated why queues at restrooms are invariably longer for ladies than for men. Time and time again. What are the main causes for this disparity? And how can it be overcome? Moving to unisex toilets, it appears from this study, may reduce waiting times for women from over 6 minutes to less than a minute and a half. Already a symbol for transgender equality, unisex toilets can hence boast excellent figures when it comes to reducing waiting times. Or, how transgender-friendliness may help in battling female-unfriendly toilet culture.
In the last couple of years, several new biobanks have been established to enable the study of health developments of people and their families over their entire lifetime. This paper reviews the legal and ethical implications of a loss of decision-making capacity by research subjects in long-term research associated with large biobanks.
Hannah Jones has refused the heart transplant that could save her life. But is a 13-year-old too young to make that decision? Or is she the only person who can?
Typically anorexia nervosa is diagnosed as a condition of teenage girls where the rates of mortality and morbidity are very high and recovery rates very low. This chapter discusses the condition as experienced in Australia by older women who have either lived with anorexia during adolescence and as young women or who have been diagnosed later in life. The discussion traverses issues of consent to treatment or its refusal, capacity to provide consent, and the application of human right protections arising from various human rights instruments.
Advance decisions and proxy decision-making in medical treatment and research 13 November 2007 June 2007 This guidance covers the law and ethical issues involved in competent individuals making advance decisions about their later medical treatment and proxy decisions about medical treatment made by other people on behalf of adults who lack mental capacity. When they are mentally competent, patients decide for themselves whether or not to accept the medical treatments recommended by health professionals. This guidance is about what happens when that mental ability to make a valid decision is lost.
The following guidance is for PCTs, local authorities, hospitals and care homes to support them understand and fulfill their statutory obligations under the Mental Capacity Act Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards legislation.
The aim of this guideline is to inform health and social care professionals on how best to manage advance care planning (ACP) in clinical practice. At the core of current health and social care are efforts to maximise individuals’ autonomy, promote patient-centred care, offer choice and the right to decide one’s own treatment or care. This can be difficult to achieve when an individual has lost capacity – the ability to make their own, informed decision. ACP is one method of enhancing autonomy, not only where an individual has lost capacity, but also by focussing discussion on the individual’s values and preferences throughout the time they are in contact with health or social care professionals. Whilst ACP has been used for some time in North America, there has been relatively little experience in the use of ACP in the UK. This set of concise evidence-based guidelines has therefore been prepared to guide practitioners.
This site explains how the law now allows people to make decisions to refuse treatments including those that sustain life. Many people want to achieve a natural and dignified death, this is one way to help achieve it. This is a free and non-profit NHS website. We suggest people enter the site using the relevent menu section (above). Many people benefit from looking at both sections.
The issue in this case is not uncommon. P is an adult who has an unresolved medical condition, in this case epilepsy. His primary carer, however well motivated, does not accept the diagnosis nor the treatment proposals. P may object to treatment (whether his own view or prompted by his carer). In order to determine what is in P's best interests, since he cannot decide for himself, it is necessary to observe him, and not to rely upon what is relayed about his condition by his carer. To that end, a period in hospital for assessment and treatment is necessary.
A fundamental aspect of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) is the statutory endorsement of a functional approach to capacity. In principle, this requires a separate assessment of capacity in respect of each decision to be made. Most capacity assessments take place at a non-judicial level, and, outside of day-to-day decisions, the most common assessors are likely to be healthcare professionals. This paper investigates the practical operation of the capacity assessment process at both judicial and non-judicial levels. It asks whether the process can deliver on the MCA's goal of preserving maximum decision-making freedom, while, at the same time, providing an appropriate degree of protection. It argues that assessors who are not legally trained encounter signific
Doctors were forced to allow a young woman to die as she had made a "living will" requesting no medical help if she attempted suicide. They would have risked breaking the law by treating Kerrie Wooltorton, 26, of Norwich, an inquest heard. Miss Wooltorton wrote her living will in September 2007, asking for no intervention if she tried to take her own life.
More than 700,000 people in the UK currently suffer from dementia, and nearly 500,000 friends and family members act as carers for people with dementia. Our rapidly ageing population means that these numbers are likely to double in the next forty years. While we are getting to understand better the causes of the disease, and diagnostic and treatment options are improving, we are still a long way from prevention or cure. Meanwhile, these people and their families, healthcare staff and care workers face difficult ethical dilemmas on a day-to-day basis. An exploratory workshop was held in March 2007, and the Nuffield Council set up a Working Party in December 2007 to examine the ethical issues raised by dementia. Following a public consultation and meetings with stakeholders including people with dementia, carers, health professionals and other members of the public, a report with recommendations for policy makers was published on 1st October 2009.
Whether treatment decision-making capacity can be meaningfully applied to patients with a diagnosis of "personality disorder" is examined. Patients presenting to a psychiatric emergency clinic with threats of self-harm are considered, two having been assessed and reviewed in detail. It was found that capacity can be meaningfully assessed in such patients, although the process is more complex than in patients with diagnoses of a more conventional kind. The process of assessing capacity in such patients is very time-consuming and may become, in itself, a therapeutic intervention.
D. Coudert, N. Nepomuceno, and H. Rivano. 11èmes Rencontres Francophones sur les Aspects Algorithmiques de Télécommunications (AlgoTel'09), Carry le Rouet, (June 2009)
N. Anthapadmanabhan, A. Barg, and I. Dumer. (2006)cite arxiv:cs/0612073
Comment: final version, 12 pages, 2 figures, to appear in IEEE Trans. on
Inform. Theory - Special Issue on Information-theoretic Security, Jun 2008,
simplified proofs in Sections II and III, changes in Theorem 4.1.
M. Pappaioanou, M. Malison, K. Wilkins, B. Otto, R. Goodman, R. Churchill, M. White, and S. Thacker. Social science & medicine, 57 (10):
1925(11/15 2003)M3: Article; Accession Number: 10903681; Pappaioanou, Marguerite 1; Email Address: mxp1@cdc.gov Malison, Michael 2 Wilkins, Karen 3 Otto, Bradley 4 Goodman, Richard A. 5 Churchill, R. Elliott 6 White, Mark 7 Thacker, Stephen B. 8; Affiliation: 1: Office of Global Health, Mailstop D-69, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA 2: Office of the Director, Public Health Practice Program Office, CDC, USA 3: Data for Decision-Making Project, Division of International Health, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, USA 4: Indonesia Office, International Health Unit, MacFarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd., Indonesia 5: Division of Public Health Systems Development and Research, Public Health Practice Program Office, CDC, USA 6: Division of International Health, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, USA 7: Division of International Health, EPO, CDC, USA 8: Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, USA; Source Info: Nov2003, Vol. 57 Issue 10, p1925; Subject Term: PUBLIC health; Subject Term: HEALTH; Subject Term: MEDICINE; Subject Term: MEXICO; Subject Term: PHILIPPINES; Subject Term: CAMEROON; Author-Supplied Keyword: Capacity building; Author-Supplied Keyword: Decision making; Author-Supplied Keyword: Epidemiology; Author-Supplied Keyword: Global health; Author-Supplied Keyword: Health information systems; Author-Supplied Keyword: Management; Author-Supplied Keyword: Public health policy; NAICS/Industry Codes: 525120 Health and Welfare Funds; Number of Pages: 13p; Document Type: Article.