Before steps are taken to impose limits on the use of social media and mobile technologies in schools, policymakers and educators need to consider the consequences for learning that such restrictions would produce. In this document, we argue that such action should carefully consider the advantages of social media for learning and that these guidelines for responsible use bring media into mentored environments where they can be safely explored and shared.
Many of the problems raised by these new technologies – from bullying to engaging in risky behavior – are not new to the public discourse, but are merely being delivered in different media. The challenge to responsible educators remains the same: to provide stimulating and safe learning environments that support the acquisition of practical skills necessary for full participation as a 21st-century citizen. Achieving this without mentored use of new technologies seems both impractical and counterproductive. One of the most powerful reasons to permit the use of social media and mobile devices in the classroom is to provide an opportunity for students to learn about their use in a supervised environment that emphasizes the development of attitudes and skills that will help keep them safe outside of school.
B. Lake, T. Ullman, J. Tenenbaum, and S. Gershman. (2016)cite arxiv:1604.00289Comment: In press at Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Open call for commentary proposals (until Nov. 22, 2016). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/information/calls-for-commentary/open-calls-for-commentary.
P. Ojha, S. Thota, V. M, and M. Tahilianni. International Journal on Soft Computing, Artificial Intelligence and Applications (IJSCAI), 4 (3/4):
01 - 18(November 2015)
H. TARIQ, W. YANG, I. HAMEED, B. AHMED, and R. KHAN. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research Journal in Information Security, Volume IV (Issue XII):
01-07(December 2017)1 Hugh A. Chipman, Edward I. George, and Robert E. McCulloch. “Bayesian CART Model Search.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 93(443), pp 935–948, September 1998. 2 Sujata Garera, Niels Provos, Monica Chew, and Aviel D. Rubin. “A framework for detection and measurement of phishing attacks.” In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Recurring malicious code - WORM ’07, page 1, 2007. 3 Abhishek Gattani, AnHai Doan, Digvijay S. Lamba, NikeshGarera, Mitul Tiwari, Xiaoyong Chai, Sanjib Das, Sri Subramaniam, AnandRajaraman, and VenkyHarinarayan. “Entity extraction, linking, classifica- tion, and tagging for social media.” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 6(11), pp 1126–1137, August 2013. 4 David D. Lewis. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. pages 4–15. 1998. 5 Justin Ma, Lawrence K. Saul, Stefan Savage, and Geoffrey M. Voelker. “Learning to detect malicious URLs.” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 2(3), pp 1–24, April 2011. 6 FadiThabtah Maher Aburrous, M.A.Hossain, KeshavDahal. “Intelligent phishing detection system for e-banking using fuzzy data mining.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37(12), pp 7913–7921, Dec 2010. 7 AnkushMeshram and Christian Haas. “Anomaly Detection in Industrial. Networks using Machine Learning: A Roadmap.” In Machine Learning for Cyber Physical Systems, pages 65–72. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017. 8 Xuequn Wang Nik Thompson,Tanya Jane McGill. “Security begins at home: Determinants of home computer and mobile device security behavior.” Computers & Security, Vol. 70, pp 376–391, Sep 2017. 9 Dan Steinberg and Phillip Colla. “CART: Classification and Regression Trees.” The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining, pp 179–201, 2009. 10 D. Teal. “Information security techniques including detection, interdiction and/or mitigation of memory injection attacks,” Google patents. Oct 2013. 11 Kurt Thomas, Chris Grier, Justin Ma, Vern Paxson, and Dawn Song. “Design and Evaluation of a Real-Time URL Spam Filtering Service.” In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp 447–462. May 2011. 12 Sean Whalen, Nathaniel Boggs, and Salvatore J. Stolfo. “Model Aggregation for Distributed Content Anomaly Detection.” In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Artificial Intelligent and Security Workshop - AISec ’14, pp 61–71, New York, USA, 2014. ACM Press. 13 Ying Yang and Geoffrey I. Webb. “Discretization for Naive-Bayes learning: managing a discretization bias and variance.” Machine Learning, Vol. 74(1), pp 39–74, Jan 2009..