K. Wang, B. Lin, B. Rettig, P. Pardi, and R. Singh. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 257--260. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
X. Li, T. Wang, and H. Wang. Database Systems for Advanced Applications: DASFAA 2017 International Workshops: BDMS, BDQM, SeCoP, and DMMOOC, Suzhou, China, March 27-30, 2017, Proceedings, page 328--339. Cham, Springer International Publishing, (2017)
M. Boroujeni, and P. Dillenbourg. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, page 206--215. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2018)
F. Bouchet, H. Labarthe, K. Yacef, and R. Bachelet. Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, page 129--134. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
R. Kizilcec, M. Sanagust'ın, and J. Maldonado. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 101--104. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2016)
J. Cambre, C. Kulkarni, M. Bernstein, and S. Klemmer. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, page 161--162. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2014)
Z. Javed, H. Qazi, and S. Khoja. 2019 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT), page 124-128. (November 2019)
A. Zhang, M. Igo, M. Facciotti, and D. Karger. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 319--322. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
Z. Pardos, S. Tang, D. Davis, and C. Le. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 23--32. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
D. Joyner, and A. Duncan. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 143–153. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 15, 2024)
R. Teusner, T. Hille, and T. Staubitz. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, page 60:1--60:10. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2018)
R. Kizilcec, G. Davis, and G. Cohen. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 121--130. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
M. Wen, and C. Rose. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, page 1983--1986. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2014)
R. Hosseini, P. Brusilovsky, M. Yudelson, and A. Hellas. Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, page 76--84. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
R. Kizilcec, M. Sanagust'ın, and J. Maldonado. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 101--104. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2016)
A. Boughoula, C. Geigle, and C. Zhai. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 303--306. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
S. Zyto, D. Karger, M. Ackerman, and S. Mahajan. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 1883--1892. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2012)
Z. Pardos, S. Tang, D. Davis, and C. Le. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 23--32. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
A. Zhang, M. Igo, M. Facciotti, and D. Karger. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 319--322. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
J. Qiu, J. Tang, T. Liu, J. Gong, C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and Y. Xue. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, page 93--102. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2016)
A. Boughoula, C. Geigle, and C. Zhai. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 303--306. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2017)
T. Daradoumis, R. Bassi, F. Xhafa, and S. Caballé. P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), 2013 Eighth International Conference on, page 208-213. IEEE, (2013)
P. Adamopoulos. ICIS, Association for Information Systems, (2013)The findings of our analysis illustrate that Professor(s) is the most important factor in online course retention and has the largest positive effect on the probability of a student to successfully complete a course. The sentiment of students for Assignments and Course Material also has positive effects on the successful completeness of a course whereas the Discussion Forum has a positive effect on the probability to partially complete a course. Furthermore, self-paced courses have a negative effect, compared to courses that follow a specific timetable. In addition, the difficulty, the workload, and the duration of a course have a negative effect. On the other hand, for the more difficult courses, self-paced timetable, longer duration in weeks, and more workload have a positive effect on the probability to successfully complete a course. Besides, final exams and projects, open textbooks, and peer assessment have also positive effects. Moreover, whether a certificate is awarded upon the successful completion of a course also affects retention. Additionally, the better a university is considered (i.e. higher ranking), the more likely that a student will successfully complete a course. Further, our results illustrate that the courses which belong to the academic disciplines of Business and Management, Computer Science, and Science have a positive significant effect in contrast to courses in other disciplines (i.e. Engineering, Humanities, and Mathematics). Finally, attrition was not found to be related with student characteristics (i.e. gender, formal education)..
S. Zyto, D. Karger, M. Ackerman, and S. Mahajan. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 1883--1892. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2012)
A. Yousef, M. Chatti, U. Schroeder, and M. Wosnitza. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on, page 44--48. IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, (2014)