S. Narayanan, M. Kaimal, K. Bijlani, M. Prasanth, and K. Kumar. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Advances in Applied Computing, page 51:1--51:5. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2014)
T. Sohn, K. Li, W. Griswold, and J. Hollan. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 433-442. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2008)
J. Coplien. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming (EuroPLoP '97). Siemens Technical Report 120/SW1/FB, page 51-60. Munich, Germany, Siemens, (1997)
K. Juuti, and J. Lavonen. NorDiNa, (2006)Construction of research based teaching sequences through Developmental research (Linsje, 1995), Educational reconstruction (Duit, Komorek & Wilbers, 1997), or Ingenierie Didactique (Artigue, 1994), can be considered very similar with design-based research. On the one hand, these approaches take into careful consideration students’ previous knowledge and emphasise basic scientific concepts and how they are related to the teaching sequence (Méhuet, 2004) and on another hand they aim to design the artefacts. For example, Andersson and Bach (2005) produced a teacher guide as an artefact describing the research-based sequence for teaching geometrical optics. However, these approaches focus on research-based design and the adoption of the innovations needs, for example, teachers’ in-service training.
(p 56).
M. Mavrikis, and S. Gutierrez-Santos. Computers & Education, 54 (3):
641 - 651(2010)Learning in Digital Worlds: Selected Contributions from the CAL 09 Conference.
M. Feuer, L. Towne, and R. Shavelson. Educational Researcher, 31 (8):
4(2002)“For example, when well-specified causal hypotheses can be formulated and randomization to treatment and control conditions is ethical and feasible, a randomized experiment is the best method for estimating effects” p. 8.